Red Hot XXX Nun Action!
"PHHHWOAARRRRR LOOK AT THE HABIT ON THAT!!"
"COR BLIMEY I WOULDN'T MIND A RUB OF THAT ROSARY."

Yummy Nunny
Nuns eh? Come on...oh, you don't think of them as sexy?
Oh, how strange. Well perhaps that's becasue you're not Antonio Rungi an Italian priest who is organising a Nun Beauty Contest
Yes, you read that right, a Nun Beauty Contest. This may seem slightly weird and a little hypocritical but the Roman Catholic Church is NOT hypocritical. They pretty much stick to bible, word for word although sheltering Nazi war criminals is a pretty broad interpretation of 'turn the other cheek'.
Anyway, more importantly, do you think they'll do the swim wear section? I wonder if they'll wear them under their habits and the judges will have to just use their imagination?
I bet they'll all be really good at the bit where they have to say what they would do if they won... "I would use my tenure as Miss Hot Nun 2008/9 to pray extra hard and maybe help other nuns be even more stern."
Do you think the Pope will be a judge? Perhaps with Peter Stringfellow and Hue Hefner? That would be great. Perhaps they could hold the final at the Playboy Mansion?
I don't know why I'm surprised. In a world where Tony Blair can be a Middle East Peace Envoy I should be no more surprised by this than I would by the BNP organising a Holocaust memorial dinner.
Comically Bankrupt
BNP favourite and none time funny man Jim Davidson is bankrupt. I suspect that if you asked him why, he would suggest that his 'comic' style was somewhat hampered by political correctness. Although he would be more likely to say something like "These days you can't even call a spade a spade without someone getting their kaftan in a twist".
Davidson is not the first 'comedian' to suffer from an inability to adapt to a changing social climate. In 1994 Bernard Manning was forced into poverty and resorted to selling layers of his fat for roof insulation to make ends meet.
In retirement Davidson will join a number of other ex-'entertainers' who's time has passed, including 'illusionist' Paul Daniels, perm-casualty Tommy Cannon, formerly of duo Cannon & Ball and below-par all rounder Brian Connolly. They will live out the remainder of their lives at a farm in Suffolk, housed in small wire cages in a barn and fed on the ground-up remains of other entertainers.
Election Fever
It's a funny thing because I consider myself relatively politically informed, aware and interested. I say relatively because most of my generation have made political apathy a life vocation, or at least they would if they could be bothered. The thing is, I've been reading up on all the candidates, trying to find reasons to vote for one. Here's the run down:
First there are the easy strike-offs:
The BNP who are still looking conspicuously uncomfortable in suits. Like if you put a bow tie on a snake, it looks OK, but you know something's not right. They are apparently keen that the "real Londoner" be put first. I think this would be a very sensible policy, if they meant that real Londoners should come before imaginary Londoners, but I don't think they mean that. I really don't.
Then there's 'Christian Choice'. I'm sure they have their hearts in the right place but I think God should stay out of politics and I'm sure he agrees with me; because he told me.
Then there's UKIP, whose name reminds me of kippers although being a mature adult I can see past that. Just. A vote for them is also about saying a big fat 'NO' to Europe. As if Europe is some kind of demon on our doorstep waiting to envelope us. They seem terrified that greater involvement will mean
we'll all be forced to wear berets, our soap will smell of garlic and beer will only be available by the cubic millimetre; and then, just like the French and Germans, we will start eating babies and raping post boxes.There's a Green candidate who is talking a lot of sense. And if you're at a loss for what to do it's not a bad vote but for me, the problem is, while green issues are more important than anything else at the moment, I can't bring myself to vote for a single issue party. I always wonder what they do about everything else. I imagine a conversation at some point in the future...
"Hooray, we've stabilised global food output against consumption and normalised global warming!""Great! So what are we going to do about the NHS?"
"Er...Look a Chaffinch!" Cue sound of hurried footsteps receding into the distance.
So that's my problem there. Which isn't going to make me popular with a lot of people, my girlfriend included.
There's a new thing called the English Democrats. They seem very concerned that our taxes are being spent in Scotland, convincing us with clever alliteration "Save London from Labour's Tartan Taxes". They are "Not Left or Right, just English"
and they want to make St George's day a national holiday. I don't think anyone takes the guy seriously including himself but I'm tempted to vote for him just because in his photo he looks like a strangely self-assured failed porn star. Wearing Marx's beard is the 'Left List'. To be honest there's not much wrong with this lot. Socialism is the opposite of capitalism and capitalism is what drives us all to want what we can't have, hate ourselves for not being celebrities and spend all our money on crap. Socialism makes sure everyone is looked after. It's as simple as that. So I like it. In theory. Unfortunately I don't think it's ever been made to work properly and there's the problem. Whenever anyone is openly 'left' all people think of is Communist Russia crumbling, which seemed to prove Socialism didn't work. And we, the wide-eyed, self-congratulatory Capitalist West, jizzed ourselves with joy as internationally dominant burger restaurants and soft drinks companies moved in to start telling the Russian populace how much better life could be if they just bought their products. Of course all it proved was that Communist Russia didn't work, because it was corrupt. And that people like rat-burgers more than equality. I think it might be a wasted vote.So once you discount the single issues, wasted votes, flag wavers, Neo-Nazis and isolationists you are left with the usual suspects. Here they are with their pitch:
Lib Dem Brian wants: Safer Streets, safer public transport and safer green spaces. (point of difference: No more Heathrow expansion)
Labour 's Ken wants: Better public transport, improved environment and safer streets. (Point of difference: Job experience)
Tory Boris wants: Safer streets. Better, safer public transport and protected green spaces. (Point of difference - Scrap £25 Congestion Charge)
So that's why it's difficult to care or even drag yourself to the voting booth. All the main candidates are much of a muchness, apart from their little points of difference which are not enough to sway me either way really. They have all identified the issues that are important to us. They all have slightly different ideas on how to achieve the same things. The problem is, I have no idea who's ideas on how to achieve those things are best and why would I? I'm not a sociologist and I haven't studied environmental development. I haven't even got glasses like all brainy people do. I just don't know.
So all I can do is take a punt. Force myself to be interested, vote and remind myself it is key to exercising my right to complain. I suggest you do the same.
NOTE:
Brian Paddick (Lib Dem) will "Bring London's Public Transport into the 21st century"
If he means we are going to have flying cars, or teleporters he is getting my vote. If not, he's still a maybe.